Cain responds to accusations. For every woman who says I harassed her, there are “thousands” who say I didn’t.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
By the same token: There are billions of people the Manson family *didn't* kill...
Fucking well good.
Okay. One reason I'm taking a particular interest in this Joe Paterno thing is because it's reminded me of something. Something which I should know full well, but due to the whole "my not giving a fuck about sports" thing, I sometimes tend to forget.
This is namely, just how deep up the ass of sports my country has its head. Case in point:
Really, that's just sad.
But on the bright side, it looks like my curse is taking.
Good.
This is namely, just how deep up the ass of sports my country has its head. Case in point:
Nike has no plans to change the name of the Joe Paterno Center, a child day care facility on the World Headquarters Campus near Beaverton, in response to a sexual abuse scandal involving one of Paterno's former Penn State University assistants, a Nike spokeswoman said this evening.
Really, that's just sad.
But on the bright side, it looks like my curse is taking.
Penn State football scandal will cost school millions
Good.
Wednesday, November 09, 2011
I'm sorry, you can't what?
Okay. As most of you know, I don't give a fuck about sports. So, the first I heard about the Penn State University/Paterno scandal--
--was yesterday when Keith Olbermann made Paterno his "worst person in the world" and called for his immediate firing, both of which he repeated today. A few hours later, Paterno was, in fact, fired, along with the school president.
You would think the Penn Board of Trustees would've done this because it is--clearly--the right thing to do in this situation. I would say this was a no-brainer: Coach fails to follow-up on reports that his employee raped children (in the coach's own locker room, no less) coach loses his job. At least.
Former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky has been charged with 40 criminal counts accusing him of sexually abusing minors. As the scandal unfolded, it became known that Penn State officials, including Joe Paterno, had known about Sandusky's unlawful behavior.
--was yesterday when Keith Olbermann made Paterno his "worst person in the world" and called for his immediate firing, both of which he repeated today. A few hours later, Paterno was, in fact, fired, along with the school president.
You would think the Penn Board of Trustees would've done this because it is--clearly--the right thing to do in this situation. I would say this was a no-brainer: Coach fails to follow-up on reports that his employee raped children (in the coach's own locker room, no less) coach loses his job. At least.
Yes, I would say this was a no-brainer, but I want to reserve that honorific for the football-lovers who care more (they really do) about a game, a team, and/or a coach's career than they do molested children.
This brings me back to the Penn Board of Trustees. Dig this quote from an AP story on the firing.
You can't characterize what he did wrong?
Asked what Paterno did wrong, [board vice chair John] Surma said: “I can’t characterize that. We thought because of the difficulties that have engulfed our university, it was necessary to make changes.”
You can't characterize what he did wrong?
Think. Try to stretch your mind. Take a minute if you have to.
Or in other words, you fired this man not because he committed foul sins, but because people knowing he committed those sins is making your school look bad.
Metaphorically speaking, I hope your school gets stomped hard in the face with football shoes, every game for the next 30 years.
On the other hand, people do get good and irritated whenever sex rears its ugly head around The World's Child Star.
Wait a minute...
Am I the only person who thinks this ad is not sexualizing children much if at all (Fanning is 17); not provocative, shocking or sickening?
...a new ad for Marc Jacobs' fragrance Oh Lola!, starring "Twilight" actress Dakota Fanning, has been pulled from the British markets after consumers complained that it was sexualizing children.
Am I the only person who thinks this ad is not sexualizing children much if at all (Fanning is 17); not provocative, shocking or sickening?
Monday, November 07, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)