You longtime members of my vast reading audience may remember an utterly creepy fella named John Derbyshire, a writer for the conservative National Review's The Corner.
He's the guy who said he thought women should have the vote--in 2009 (how generous!)--but never use it. He's the guy whose reaction to the shocking killings at Virginia Tech was to call the students cowards for not rushing the killer, as he's quite sure he would've done.
He's the guy who said he thought women should have the vote--in 2009 (how generous!)--but never use it. He's the guy whose reaction to the shocking killings at Virginia Tech was to call the students cowards for not rushing the killer, as he's quite sure he would've done.
Yeah, that guy. I love him. He's just so perfectly fucked in the head.
So now, he's weighed in on the whole "Herman Cain/sexual harassment" thing (about which, for the record, I really couldn't give that much of a fuck. Except to observe that as always, it's not the offense that sinks you, it's the covering and backpedaling and filling ).
Brace yourselves...
Is there anyone who thinks sexual harassment is a real thing?
Um, well, there's the law...ah, but Mr. Derbyshire has anticipated me here, for his next statement is:
Is there anyone who doesn’t know it’s all a lawyers’ ramp, like “racial discrimination“?
I'm not totally sure what he means by "lawyers' ramp," but I think I can get the gist. Which doesn't really matter because I'm still reeling from his assertion that "racial discrimination" isn't a real thing either.
Across the country right now, Republicans are trying to fix the laws so as to make it harder for blacks to vote.
You know what I think the difference is between paying a girl (or a woman, ahem) a compliment and sexual harassment? Respect. I'd like to believe that most of the time, women do know the difference.
Well yeah, John, yeah it is, unless you're living in the 1950's. Oh, wait...
Well, except for the Netherlands, Denmark, Japan, Canada, or pretty much any place where they practice Buddhism, I'm sure he's quite correct.
Um, no. You're supposed to believe that harassment and discrimination are real things that do go on and need to be taken seriously when they do. As for women being groped in every office or crosses burning on every lawn, so far as I'm aware no one's asserted that. I think you might be projecting a little wish fulfillment there, John.
You wouldn't think he'd be talking too much about grown-ups, would you, considering he's the guy who publicly asserted that only pubescent girls are attractive...
You pay a girl a compliment nowadays, she runs off and gets lawyered up.
You know what I think the difference is between paying a girl (or a woman, ahem) a compliment and sexual harassment? Respect. I'd like to believe that most of the time, women do know the difference.
Is this any way to live?
Well yeah, John, yeah it is, unless you're living in the 1950's. Oh, wait...
There has never in the history of the world been a people better mannered and less inclined to insulting acts of prejudice than today’s Americans,
Well, except for the Netherlands, Denmark, Japan, Canada, or pretty much any place where they practice Buddhism, I'm sure he's quite correct.
yet we’re supposed to believe that the nation is seething with “harassment” and “discrimination,” women being groped in every business office and crosses burning on every lawn.
Um, no. You're supposed to believe that harassment and discrimination are real things that do go on and need to be taken seriously when they do. As for women being groped in every office or crosses burning on every lawn, so far as I'm aware no one's asserted that. I think you might be projecting a little wish fulfillment there, John.
Aren’t there any grown-ups around?
You wouldn't think he'd be talking too much about grown-ups, would you, considering he's the guy who publicly asserted that only pubescent girls are attractive...
3 comments:
Oh, John Derbyshire. What a guy. I remember him from an assertion some years back that women peak in terms of attractiveness at some early age, like 20 or something. He's a total crank. I missed this one, though, so thanks! (Found your blog via a link on Cal's Canadian Cave, btw.)
Oh, it was younger than age 20. That's what I was referring to in the last paragraph. Thanks for taking a look at the blog.
Oops, missed the last paragraph! I'm really a better reader than that....
Post a Comment