It strikes me that all her invective and "controversial remarks" have but one purpose: The financial enrichment of Ann Coulter.
The section of Coulter's new book that's making headlines and getting her on highly-rated TV shows is her attack on a small group of 9/11 widows whose main sin seems to be that they made commercials for John Kerry. (Has anyone asked her if she'd object to 9/11 widows making commercials for Bush-Cheney?)
If memory serves, at least one 9/11 widow did just that.
Last night, Jay Leno had Coulter on, paired with George Carlin for what NBC press releases promised would be mano a mano combat. But that was a false promise because Carlin, even if he thinks Coulter is utterly wrongheaded, is not about to fault someone too much for saying things that some find offensive. He kind of makes his living doing that, after all. Leno offered a feeble challenge to her views but since she's good at this kind of thing and since her supporters packed The Tonight Show audience to cheer her, she came off as a superstar, at least to the kind of viewer likely to ever buy her book. I suppose Jay and his producers thought it was worth it because of the ratings they'd get with the great Carlin-Coulter Slap-Off...but they didn't even get that. The numbers for last night were about average for a Wednesday, maybe even a few tenths of a point off. I'd like to think it's because America, like me, is already bored with this bogus controversy.
Mark's right.
2 comments:
But the problem with Ann Coulter is not that her statements are "controversial," it's that they're indefensible by any civilized standard.
"I think gay people should have full and equal rights to marry" is a controversial statement.
"I think we should execute anyone who doesn't agree with that to show the squares we mean business," is more along the lines of what Coulter says.
Prove, using specific examples, that liberals alloted the same prominence that Ann Coulter is by conservatives have made statements as indefensible as she has and been given a pass.
Or don't waste my time.
I see Texas unTruth did not respond.
Why am I not surprised?
I tried debating him on the Galesburg diploma controversy. He only has talking points - facts are not included.
Post a Comment